The blend arithmetic is printed here
Eight ingredients, 1,200 mg, and a hard ceiling for every position in the order. The label gives you one number; this site gives you eight.
A men's capsule, 60 to a bottle, one or two a day with water. The front of the bottle carries one claim, Male Enhancement, with no asterisk beside it. The panel behind it is a single 1,200 mg blend holding eight ingredients, none of them priced in milligrams.









Every line below is read off the bottle, the printed panel or the seller's own pages. Where we were not given a figure, the row says so instead of guessing.
| Detail | What the label and the seller say |
|---|---|
| Product | Horse Mood, a dietary supplement carrying the brand line Vitalifes |
| Front of bottle | HORSEMOOD · Male Enhancement · Dietary Supplement · 60 Capsules |
| Claims on the front | One. The phrase Male Enhancement, with no asterisk beside it |
| Form | Gelatin capsules |
| Count | 60 capsules a bottle |
| Serving | One or two capsules daily with an 8 oz. glass of water |
| Servings per bottle | 30, which assumes two capsules a serving |
| Amounts printed | One of eight. The 1,200 mg blend total, and nothing else |
| The blend | Test Boost Proprietary Blend, 1,200 mg, holding eight ingredients |
| Standardisation | None stated for any extract on the label |
| Animal-derived | Two: the gelatin capsule, and orchic substance in the blend |
| Distributor | None printed. No “Distributed by” line anywhere on the bottle |
| Price | Not published to us. The checkout is the only figure |
| Returns | The marketplace listing's window. No seller money-back window published |
| Shipping | Ships from the United States. Cost and speed: not published |
| Expiry on the bottle | 07-2028 |
| Order desk | +1 (302) 200-3480, with your order ID |
| Sold by | Thehorsemood, U.S. stocking partner for Horse Mood |
Horse Mood is a men's capsule built on the standard ingredient list for this category: horny goat weed, tongkat ali, saw palmetto, nettle root, wild yam, sarsaparilla, orchic substance and boron. All eight sit inside one Test Boost Proprietary Blend of 1,200 mg, and the label publishes no individual amount for any of them. One of the eight has a placebo-controlled trial behind it at a stated dose. Two have no supporting evidence at all. The only claim on the product is the phrase on the front.
Every figure on this site is read off the printed panel, and every gap is named as a gap.
Most supplement labels are noisy. Six claims across the front, an asterisk on each one, a marketing panel repeating them, a badge announcing that the formula is advanced.
This one is not. The front of the Horse Mood bottle carries the brand mark, a horse, the word count, the words Dietary Supplement, and one claim: Male Enhancement. That is the entire promise, and the brand's own listing panels add nothing to it. They are labelled Product Formula, Supplement Facts, Bottle Label, Daily Routine, Label Directions, Product Format and Adult Use. Not one of them says the product does anything.
That restraint is unusual in this category and we want to credit it properly. A product that declines to invent benefits is easier to evaluate than one that lists nine.
The difficulty is that the two words it does use are the vaguest in the aisle. Male enhancement has no regulatory definition, no stated endpoint and no explanation anywhere else on the bottle. Enhancement of what, measured how, by how much: the label does not say, and the panel behind it does not publish a single ingredient amount that would let anyone work it out.
So this site is about two questions. What is actually in the capsule, as far as the label allows anyone to tell. And what those two words mean, given that nothing on the product defines them.
Nothing on this label claims to treat erectile dysfunction, and no dietary supplement may lawfully do so. If that is your reason for being here, the first step is a doctor, and our safety page explains why that matters more in this category than in any other.

Horse Mood is a men's supplement in gelatin capsules, 60 to a bottle, carrying the brand line Vitalifes. The suggested use panel says one or two capsules daily with an 8 oz. glass of water. The Supplement Facts panel treats two capsules as one serving and prints 30 servings per container, so the bottle is either a thirty-day supply or a sixty-day one depending on which end of the instruction you follow.
The panel declares a single Test Boost Proprietary Blend of 1,200 mg and lists eight ingredients underneath it. Under federal rules that list is in descending order of weight, which is the only quantitative information the label gives away.
The back of this bottle is, in fairness, carefully made. It names the plant part for every botanical and gives a Latin binomial for six of them. Its footnote is spelled correctly. The caution, storage and warning panels are specific and complete.
What it does not do is tell you how much of anything you are swallowing. That is the trade this product asks you to accept, and the rest of this page is about what it costs you.
Six reasons, and the first three are the ones that cost us money.
Eight ingredients, 1,200 mg, and a hard ceiling for every position in the order. The label gives you one number; this site gives you eight.
We print the phrase on the front, the rule about where a disclaimer has to sit, and a photograph of the panel, and we let you judge.
Nine of them, including every individual amount, the price, and the fact that no distributor is named anywhere on the bottle.
Thehorsemood, the U.S. stocking partner, with an office and a returns address in New York and an order desk that answers.
Male enhancement is the one supplement category where the FDA repeatedly finds undeclared prescription drugs. We explain what that means for how you buy, in this aisle generally.
A commission on every order placed through this site, disclosed on this page, on the reviews page and in the footer of every page.
Four routes, in the order the label supports them.
The one ingredient with a placebo-controlled trial pointing the right way. A 2021 study in Food & Nutrition Research gave 105 men aged 50 to 70 with baseline testosterone below 300 ng/dL either 100 mg or 200 mg a day of a standardised aqueous root extract for twelve weeks. The 200 mg group saw total testosterone rise from week four and reported less fatigue. Second of eight here, ceiling 600 mg, amount not published.
The mineral with the most plausible mechanism and the smallest possible share, since it is last of eight and last place is always the total divided by the number of members. Typical total intake from food and supplements is 1.0 to 1.5 mg a day and the adult upper limit is 20 mg.
Both are prostate ingredients rather than testosterone ones. A 2023 review of 27 studies found saw palmetto alone gives little or no benefit for benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms, and nettle's positive results come mainly from combinations rather than from nettle by itself.
First in the blend order, so the largest share. Its active compound is icariin, and a 2019 human trial dosing icariin from 100 mg up to 1,680 mg found blood levels very low or undetectable, with nearly all samples below 1 ng/mL. The problem is absorption rather than amount.
No published human trial exists on this formula. Everything above describes what individual ingredients are understood to do at doses this label does not publish.
In printed order, which under federal rules is descending order by weight. The ceiling beside each one is the most it could possibly weigh: the blend total divided by its position in the list.
First in the printed order, so the heaviest ingredient in the capsule. Its active compound is icariin, and a 2019 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled human trial gave icariin from 100 mg up to 1,680 mg and found blood levels very low or undetectable, with nearly all samples below 1 ng/mL. Absorption, not dose, is the problem here.
The one ingredient on this label with a placebo-controlled trial pointing the right way. A 2021 study gave 200 mg a day of a standardised aqueous root extract to 105 men aged 50 to 70 with low baseline testosterone, for twelve weeks, and saw total testosterone rise. Its ceiling here clears that dose. Its actual amount is not published.
A prostate ingredient rather than a hormonal one. A 2023 review of 27 studies found saw palmetto alone gives little or no benefit for benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. Nothing links it to raising testosterone or to the phrase on the front of this bottle.
Studied alongside saw palmetto for urinary symptoms rather than on its own for hormones. Memorial Sloan Kettering notes positive clinical results mainly when nettle is combined with other herbs, including a saw palmetto combination for nighttime urinary frequency.
On the label because laboratories use its diosgenin as a raw material for making steroid hormones. Memorial Sloan Kettering is blunt about the leap that follows: there is no evidence that the human body can convert diosgenin into progesterone.
Sixth of eight. Long used in traditional preparations and sometimes marketed as a steroid precursor on the same reasoning as wild yam, which does not hold up here either. No established dose for this use.
Bovine testicle tissue. The reference monographs say there is no good scientific evidence to support its use, that it is not clear whether it provides testosterone, and that there is not enough reliable information to know what an appropriate dose would be.
The mineral with the most plausible hormonal mechanism and the smallest possible share, since last place is always the blend total divided by the number of members. Typical total intake is 1.0 to 1.5 mg a day and the adult upper limit is 20 mg, so any real share is safe.
See the full Supplement Facts panel for every line on the label.
The only quantitative work this label makes possible, done in full.
The most this position could weigh200 mg = the tongkat ali trial dosemilligrams per 2-capsule serving
Tongkat ali, at 200 mg a day of standardised extract for twelve weeks, is the only dose in this formula with a randomised placebo-controlled trial behind it. Tongkat ali sits second of eight, so its ceiling is 600 mg and that dose is arithmetically possible. Whether it is actually present is exactly what the panel does not say, and no calculation can recover it.
Read that carefully, because it is the strongest statement this page can make. Every bar is a ceiling derived from the printed order, not a measured amount. The label permits us to prove what is impossible and never to confirm what is present.
Blend total divided by position in the list. You can check every row of this in your head, which is the point of printing it.
| Ingredient | Position | Ceiling | What that ceiling is worth knowing against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horny goat weed | 1st of 8 | 1,200 mg | Unbounded in practice. The trial that matters found blood levels near zero at every dose up to 1,680 mg, so the ceiling is not the issue. |
| Tongkat ali | 2nd of 8 | 600 mg | Clears the 200 mg used in the trial, three times over. Possible; not confirmed. |
| Saw palmetto | 3rd of 8 | 400 mg | Comfortably covers standard doses, for a use a 2023 review of 27 studies found little support for. |
| Nettle root | 4th of 8 | 300 mg | Studied mainly in combination, so there is no single dose to compare it against. |
| Wild yam | 5th of 8 | 240 mg | Irrelevant. The body cannot convert diosgenin into a hormone at any dose. |
| Sarsaparilla | 6th of 8 | 200 mg | No established dose for this use to compare it against. |
| Orchic substance | 7th of 8 | 171 mg | Not enough reliable information to know what an appropriate dose would even be. |
| Boron | 8th of 8 | 150 mg | Far above any sensible amount, and the real figure will be a small fraction of it. |
Two of the eight have a dose worth reaching and a ceiling that clears it. Four have no dose to reach at all. That distribution, rather than any single number, is what this table is for.

The phrase Male Enhancement sits on the front of this bottle in two lines, with no asterisk beside it. The FDA disclaimer is printed on the back panel, attached to the Supplement Facts box.
The relevant rule is 21 CFR 101.93. Paragraph (c) sets the disclaimer text. Paragraph (d) says where it has to go: on each panel or page carrying a statement of nutritional support, either adjacent to the statement with no intervening material, or linked to it by a symbol such as an asterisk, with the disclaimer set off in a box.
Whether those two words are a statement of nutritional support is a judgement, and it is not ours to make. They describe an effect on the body, which points one way. They could also be read as a category descriptor, which points the other.
So we are not alleging a violation, and we are not going to pretend we did not notice. Here is the rule, here is the photograph, and here is the one sentence that matters: the most prominent words on this product are the least defined, and the panel that would qualify them is on the other side of the bottle.

Transcribed from the bottle and the brand's own listing panels. The read beside each one is ours. This list is unusually short, and that is a fact about the product rather than an oversight on our part.

On most products in this aisle these panels carry the benefit claims that the Supplement Facts box cannot support: energy, stamina, vitality, confidence, each with an asterisk. They are where a label goes to promise things.
Both of this brand’s panels decline to. They are navigation, pointing back at the formula, the facts panel, the directions and the format. The recurring instruction across both is Follow Label Directions.
That leaves the entire promise of this product resting on two words printed on the front of the bottle, which is what the cards below are about.
The only claim on this product, printed on the front in two words, with no asterisk beside it and no disclaimer on that panel. The phrase has no regulatory definition and no stated endpoint. Nothing else on the bottle or in the brand's marketing explains what it means.
The name of the blend, printed inside the Supplement Facts box. A blend name is chosen by the company and is not a regulated statement. One ingredient in it, tongkat ali, has a placebo-controlled trial behind it at 200 mg a day of standardised extract; its amount here is not published.
A navigation label on the brand's own listing panel, sitting beside a photograph of capsules. It makes no claim about what the formula does, which is worth noting rather than criticising.
Another navigation label, beside a calendar graphic. It says take it daily. That is a restatement of the suggested use panel and nothing more.
Printed twice across the two marketing panels. On a product in this category, pointing the buyer back at the label rather than at a benefit is the most defensible thing in the brand's marketing.
A badge on the second listing panel, and consistent with the caution printed on the bottle. Verifiable, accurate, and one of the few marks in this category that means exactly what it says.
Six entries, and only the first two are claims in any meaningful sense. The rest are navigation labels on a marketing panel that declines to promise anything. We would rather say that plainly than invent claims in order to knock them down.
An editorial score of 2.4 out of 5 follows from that list. The full breakdown, category by category, is further down this page.
Six each way. The right-hand side is where the useful reading is.
Tongkat ali, horny goat weed, saw palmetto, nettle root and boron are the names that appear on almost every product in this category. If you want them in one capsule rather than five bottles, that is what this is.
The format is genuinely easy. One serving, no split dose, no loading phase, nothing to time around a meal or a workout.
Every review the seller supplied came from a man between 43 and 65. That is who is actually buying this.
Eight ingredients share 1,200 mg. We publish the ceiling for every position in that order, which is the only quantitative work this label makes possible and the one thing it will not do for you.
The seller's own summary says most buyers waited three to six weeks. Knowing that before you start is worth more than any claim on the bottle.
This label rewards that habit. The back is detailed, correctly spelled, and names a plant part and a Latin binomial for every botanical. The front is two words.
You cannot. There is one number on this entire panel. Every individual amount is inside a proprietary blend and none of them is published.
Nothing on this label claims that, no ingredient on it is approved to treat erectile dysfunction, and erectile dysfunction is a medical condition with medical treatment. Start with a doctor.
Two reasons. The capsule shell is gelatin, and the blend contains orchic substance, which is bovine testicle tissue.
The bottle says so outright: pregnant or nursing mothers, children under 18 and anyone with a known medical condition should consult a physician first.
Nitrates matter in this category for a specific reason set out on our safety page. Saw palmetto and nettle root are both prostate ingredients. Show the panel to your pharmacist before the first capsule.
Tongkat ali's positive trial used 200 mg a day of a standardised extract. Its ceiling here is 600 mg, so the dose is possible, and the label does not say whether it is present.
Four steps, and the second one is a decision the label leaves entirely to you.
It says: as a dietary supplement, take one (1) or two (2) capsules daily with an 8 oz. glass of water. That is the whole instruction. Nothing about food, timing or cycling appears anywhere on the bottle.
At two capsules you take the full 1,200 mg blend and the bottle lasts thirty days. At one you take 600 mg and it lasts sixty. The label offers both and does not say who should take which, so start at one and treat two as the ceiling.
The 8 oz. is in the instruction for a reason. Seven botanicals in a gelatin capsule go down better with water in front and water after, and a gelatin shell taken dry is the usual cause of a capsule sticking.
Nothing in the formula is stimulant-like, so there is no reason to avoid the evening. The reviewers who reported anything had taken it daily without gaps, which is the only variable on this page you fully control.
Do not exceed the recommended dose. That is the bottle's own caution, and on a blend with no published amounts there is no way to reason about what a larger serving would contain.

This panel is the best-made part of the label and it deserves to be read before the front.
The storage line is unusually specific: keep away from heat, light, and humidity to preserve freshness. Humidity is the one people ignore, and it matters here because the capsule shell is gelatin. A bathroom cabinet is the worst common storage place in a house.
The caution is complete and correctly aimed: do not exceed recommended dose, and pregnant or nursing mothers, children under the age of 18 and individuals with a known medical condition should consult a physician before using this or any dietary supplement.
The boxed warning covers the three things that actually go wrong with a supplement bottle: keep out of the reach of children, do not use if the safety seal is damaged or missing, store in a cool dry place.
And the expiry is printed on the bottle rather than stamped illegibly on the base: 07-2028.
A comparison of approaches, not a ranking of brands. We sell one of these columns.
| Horse Mood | A blend that prints its amounts | Buying tongkat ali on its own | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts published | 1 of 8 | All of them | The one that matters |
| Can you check a dose against research? | No | Yes | Yes |
| Standardisation stated | None | Usually | Usually, and it is the point |
| Number of ingredients | 8 | Varies | 1 |
| Capsules a day | 1 to 2 | 2 to 4 | 1 to 2 |
| Animal-derived components | Two | Usually the capsule only | Usually the capsule only |
| Claims on the front | One, undefined | Usually several | Usually one, with a dose beside it |
| Price visible before checkout | No | Usually yes | Usually yes |
The pattern is worth stating plainly. This product wins on format and restraint, and loses on verifiability. If one specific ingredient is your reason for buying, a product that prints that ingredient's amount will always serve you better, and that is true of every blend in this column rather than a criticism of this one alone.
Pack sizes we can confirm. Prices we cannot, because none was published to us.






No price was published to us. We print no figure we have not seen ourselves. · Returns run on the listing’s window, not a seller guarantee · What that actually means
No price was published to us, so this section is a method rather than a number. When the checkout screen shows you a figure, three sums are worth doing before you agree to it.
Cost per day at the panel's serving: bottle price divided by thirty. That is the number to compare against anything else you are considering, and it is the only serving the 30-servings line supports.
Cost per day at one capsule: bottle price divided by sixty. Half the money and half the blend. The label offers this and does not say who it is for.
Cost of a fair trial: cost per day times forty-two. Six weeks is the far end of the wait the seller's own review summary describes, and knowing what that costs before you start is the difference between a decision and a drift.
That last sum is the one people skip, and it is the one that should decide your pack size.
Read the return window on the checkout screen and compare it against six weeks. If the window is shorter than the trial, the option to return closes before you know whether the product does anything, and one bottle is the sensible buy rather than six.
There is no published safety study on this formula. That is ordinary for the category. What is less ordinary is that the usual fallback is closed too.
Assessing a supplement's safety normally starts with an amount. Boron is a nutrient at 1 mg a day and has a tolerable upper intake level of 20 mg. Saw palmetto at a normal dose is well tolerated and interacts with a specific class of medicines. Every one of those sentences needs a number, and this panel publishes none.
So the honest answer to “is 1,200 mg of this blend safe for me” is that nobody outside the manufacturer can tell. In practice the amounts are probably modest, because 1,200 mg split eight ways does not leave room for anything extreme. That is a reasonable inference and it is still an inference, and we will not dress it up as reassurance.
Two things on this label are certain and worth knowing. The capsule shell is gelatin. And orchic substance, seventh in the blend, is bovine testicle tissue, which raises sourcing questions that plant material does not and which the label does not address.
If you take any prescription medicine at all, the answer is not on this page and it is not on the bottle. Show the panel to the pharmacist who dispenses your prescriptions.
Left column is time. Middle is what the seller's reviewers described. Right is what the label could actually account for.
| When | What reviewers said | What the label could support |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Wanting more than they got. The seller's own summary lists this among the common dislikes. | Very little. Nothing in this formula has a fast mechanism, and the trial behind the one evidenced ingredient measured nothing before twelve weeks. |
| Weeks 2 to 3 | Still little. The three-star reviewer in the supplied set stopped around day 19. | Nothing a trial would have caught. Hormonal endpoints are measured in months. |
| Weeks 3 to 6 | The window the seller's summary names as the most common wait. | Long enough for a daily habit to be established, which is what most of the positive reviews actually describe. |
| Weeks 7 to 12 | Several reviewers name days in the thirties and forties, describing the habit sticking and reordering. | The tongkat ali trial ran twelve weeks at 200 mg a day. If this blend carries a comparable amount, twelve weeks is the earliest the comparison applies. |
| Beyond 12 weeks | Not covered by the reviews we were given. | Nothing here is a course with an end date. Continuing is a question about cost, not about a finishing line. |
One to two bottles is the honest minimum at the panel's two-capsule serving. Check the listing's return window against six weeks before you order more.
This section is about the category rather than about this product, and we want to be exact about the difference.
Male enhancement is the supplement category where the FDA most often finds undeclared prescription drugs. The agency maintains a public list of sexual-enhancement products found to contain hidden ingredients, most commonly sildenafil, the active ingredient in Viagra. Its own notifications warn that such an ingredient “may interact with nitrates found in some prescription drugs, such as nitroglycerin, and may lower blood pressure to dangerous levels”.
Two sentences from the agency matter more than the list itself. The first: “This list covers only a small fraction of the contaminated products on the market. If a product is not on the list, that does not mean it is safe.” The second: the FDA “is unable to test and identify all products marketed as dietary supplements that have potentially harmful hidden ingredients”.
We have no basis to suspect this product of anything of the kind, we are not suggesting it, and it does not appear on that list. What we are saying is that absence from the list proves nothing, by the agency's own account, and that this is the one aisle where that caveat should change how you shop.
The practical consequences are three. Buy through a route you can trace to a seller with an address and a phone number. Check the seal and the panel on arrival. And if you take nitrates for your heart, do not buy anything in this category without asking your doctor first, whatever its label says.
A botanical blend whose ingredients are all identifiable plant and mineral material is a different proposition from an unnamed capsule bought from an unknown storefront. The checks on our batch page take a minute and they are the cheapest insurance available in this category.
One route, and these are the people and places along it.
Thehorsemood, the U.S. stocking partner. Publishes these pages, earns a commission on orders, and holds no payment and no order records.
The marketplace listing, where the price appears for the first time, where the pack is chosen and where the return window is set.
+1 (302) 200-3480, operated by BuyGoods. Orders, tracking, changes and refunds. Have your order ID ready.
1 Astor Place, Floor 8, New York, NY 10003. The business address for the stocking partner, and not a returns address.
540 Madison Avenue, Floor 18, New York, NY 10022. Tracked, at the buyer's cost, with your name, email and order ID inside the parcel.
Not published. This bottle carries no distributor line at all, and the only company name on it is the brand line Vitalifes.
Supplied by the seller and shown unedited, including the three-star one. We wrote none of them and cannot verify any of them.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Wanted a faster change. Called +1 (302) 200-3480. Stopped at two.
Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last bottle.
Reviews supplied by the seller and shown unedited. We have written none of them.
Taken from the seller's own summary and from the lower-rated review in the set.
The most common complaint, and the one the seller's own summary lists first. It is consistent with the formula: nothing here works quickly, and the trial behind the one evidenced ingredient took twelve weeks.
The same complaint from the other end. Week one is inside the noise of any study ever run on any of these ingredients.
The three-star reviewer in the supplied set wanted a faster change, called the order desk and stopped. That is a reasonable thing to have done at two bottles, and we would not argue with it.
Not one review in the set mentions a blood test, a number or a measured outcome. What the positive ones describe is a daily habit sticking, which is an adherence story rather than an efficacy one.
One of the short lines the seller supplied is simply “Desk answered.” It is a small thing and it is the sort of small thing that decides whether a purchase goes badly.
No reviewer in the set reports a side effect, a damaged bottle or a refused refund. On a set of eight that is not proof of anything, and it is worth printing alongside the complaints rather than only the complaints.
Four steps. The first one happens before you buy.
The return window is the one printed on the marketplace listing. No seller money-back guarantee could be confirmed, so that window is the protection you actually have. Compare it against six weeks.
Call before posting anything back, so that the return is expected and recorded against your order.
540 Madison Avenue, Floor 18, New York, NY 10022. Full name, order email and order ID on a slip in the box. Return shipping is the buyer's cost.
Three to five business days at the seller's end after the return is credited, then five to ten days for the card. The second clock belongs to your bank.
A summary of buyer feedback we were given mentions a 60-day window. That is buyer recollection rather than a published seller term, so it does not appear as a guarantee anywhere on this site.
Scored against what the label and the seller publish, not against how it feels to take. We have not tested this product in a trial and we do not pretend to have.
A standard men's-category blend sold behind a single number and two undefined words. The unusual thing is what this label does not do: the brand's own panels make no health claim at all, and the back of the bottle is careful and specific about plant parts and species. Then the front says Male Enhancement with no asterisk and no definition, and the panel behind it publishes not one individual amount. If tongkat ali is what you want, the trial that worked used 200 mg a day of a standardised extract, and you can buy exactly that with the number printed on the bottle.
Every one was opened and read. Where a source stated a limitation, the limitation is quoted rather than the headline.
Every source above was opened and read. Studies that found nothing are included on purpose.
A men's supplement in gelatin capsules, 60 to a bottle, carrying the brand line Vitalifes. The panel gives a serving size of 2 capsules and 30 servings per container, and declares one Test Boost Proprietary Blend of 1,200 mg holding eight ingredients. The front says Male Enhancement and nothing else.
Nothing defined. It is a category euphemism with no regulatory meaning and no stated endpoint, and nothing else on the bottle explains it. It is the only claim on the front.
21 CFR 101.93(d) requires the FDA disclaimer to appear on each panel carrying a statement of nutritional support, either adjacent to it or linked by a symbol such as an asterisk. Here the disclaimer is on the back and the front claim carries no symbol. Whether those two words are such a statement is a judgement we are not qualified to make for you.
Because the label uses a proprietary blend. Under 21 CFR 101.36(c) a blend declares the total weight of its dietary ingredients and lists them in descending order of weight; individual amounts are not required. It is legal, common here, and why no dose on this bottle can be checked.
Upper bounds only. Descending order means the ingredient in position n cannot exceed the total divided by n. Horny goat weed could be up to 1,200 mg, tongkat ali up to 600 mg, boron up to 150 mg. Ceilings, not amounts.
The blend is called Test Boost, and one ingredient has a placebo-controlled trial behind it: tongkat ali at 200 mg a day of standardised extract, in men aged 50 to 70 with low baseline testosterone, over twelve weeks. Its ceiling here is 600 mg. Whether it is present is not published.
No, and nothing on the label claims it is. Erectile dysfunction is a medical condition with medical treatment, no ingredient here is approved to treat it, and a supplement may not lawfully claim to. The first step is a doctor.
The label allows either and does not say which. At two capsules you get the full 1,200 mg and the bottle lasts thirty days. At one you get 600 mg and it lasts sixty. Start at one and treat two as the ceiling.
The seller's summary says most buyers waited three to six weeks and lists a slow start among the common dislikes. The trial behind the one evidenced ingredient ran twelve weeks. No result is promised and no published trial exists on this formula.
Not published. This bottle carries no “Distributed by” line at all. The only company name on it is the brand line Vitalifes, with no address, phone number or website.
No price was published to us. Pack prices are the ones printed on the marketplace listing at checkout. We print no price we have not seen ourselves.
The window printed on the marketplace listing. No seller money-back guarantee could be confirmed. A summary of buyer feedback mentions a 60-day window, but that is recollection rather than a published term.
One bottle is 60 capsules: thirty days at two a day, sixty at one. Eight ingredients share a 1,200 mg blend, and the price is shown at checkout.
Order NowRead the label firstNo price was published to us. We print no figure we have not seen ourselves. · Returns run on the listing’s window · Not for pregnancy or nursing